MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402518029 · doi:10.1016/j.pss.2024.105971

Isotopic fractionation of methane on Mars via diffusive separation in the subsurface

2024· article· en· W4402518029 on OpenAlexafffund
John E. Moores, H. M. Sapers

Bibliographic record

VenuePlanetary and Space Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Space AgencyYork University
KeywordsMars Exploration ProgramMethaneFractionationAtmosphere of MarsGeologyAstrobiologyMass-independent fractionationSeparation (statistics)Environmental scienceIsotope fractionationMartianChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many processes have been identified in the Martian subsurface which may produce or release methane that eventually can be emitted into the atmosphere. Given the wide range of isotopic values for source carbon reported on Mars and the importance of atmospheric methane isotopologues as a tracer for subsurface processes, it is critical to quantify the level of isotopic fractionation that can occur during subsurface transport. On Earth, isotopic fractionation occurs when methane transport is dominated by Knudsen diffusion through small pores. However, unlike the Earth, on Mars the low atmospheric pressure and commensurate longer mean free path suggest that most subsurface transport of methane occurs in the Knudsen regime, amplifying this effect. Here, we report on simulations of diffusion through the martian subsurface and report on the level of fractionation that would be expected under two end-member scenarios. For Interplanetary Dust Particles (IDPs) incorporated in near-surface sediments in which methane is released quickly upon generation, atmospheric emissions of methane are expected to be representative of the reservoir isotopic ratio. However, for deeper sources in which methane accumulates as trapped gas, subsurface transport will result in depletions of 13 CH 4 compared to reservoir concentrations by approximately −31‰. Over time, both the reservoir and the emitted gas will evolve to become isotopically enriched in 13 CH 4 compared to a standard of constant isotopic ratio. This necessitates temporal measurements of emitted methane to understand the δ 13 C of the reservoir and depth of the release, preferably with hourly or better frequency. Finally, a seasonal cycle in δ 13 C with an amplitude of 5.3‰ is expected with adsorption acting to create small temporary reservoirs that are filled and emptied over the year by the subsurface thermal wave. This effect may provide a way to probe near-surface thermophysical properties. • Knudsen diffusion may be widespread in the martian subsurface causing fractionation. • Atmospheric methane derived from shallow solid sources (IDPs) are likely unaltered. • Atmospheric methane derived from deep sources can be significantly fractionated. • Seasonal isotopic variations can give information about subsurface properties. • High frequency methane measurement is needed to determine source isotopic ratios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlanetary and Space ScienceSame topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207