MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402520339 · doi:10.7870/cjcmh-2024-013

Perceptions des personnes utilisatrices de Suicide.ca et de l’application Mes outils

2024· article· fr· W4402520339 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Julie Lane, Louis‐Philippe Côté, Luiza Maria Mancea, Céline Verchère

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Community Mental Health · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicSuicide and Self-Harm Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPoison controlSuicidal behaviorPolitical scienceSuicide preventionMedicineArtMedical emergency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plusieurs pays ont mis en place des technologies numériques pour mieux prévenir les suicides. Le Québec accusait un certain retard sur ce plan. En mai 2017, l’Association québécoise de prévention du suicide (AQPS) a été mandatée par le ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux (MSSS) du Québec pour élaborer une Stratégie numérique en prévention du suicide. Cet article vise à décrire les perceptions des personnes utilisatrices de Suicide.ca et de l’application Mes outils. Un devis mixte et convergent a été privilégié incluant des entrevues individuelles auprès de personnes usagères de services (N = 33) et un sondage auprès de personnes intervenantes (N = 477). Les résultats mettent en lumière leurs perceptions positives et des pistes de rehaussement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.869
Threshold uncertainty score0.261

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Community Mental HealthSame topicSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesFrench-language works237,207