MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4402521647 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2024.280

A Case of Paroxysmal Tonic Spasms in Pediatric Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder

2024· article· fr· W4402521647 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Emanuel Mostofi, Colin Wilbur

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsWomen and Children’s Health Research InstituteUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuromyelitis opticaSpectrum disorderMedicinePediatricsDermatologyPsychiatryMultiple sclerosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare autoimmune disease of the central nervous system characterized primarily by recurrent optic neuritis and myelitis, having a strong association with aquaporin-4 (AQP4) antibody.1 NMOSD is uncommon in the general population, with an estimated incidence ranging from 0.05 to 0.4 per 100,000 per year and prevalence of 0.52 to 4.4/100,000, and is even more rare in the pediatric population. 2 AQP4 antibody seropositivity has been reported in approximately 40% of pediatric NMOSD.3 A potential complication of NMOSD is paroxysmal (painful) tonic spasms (PTS), which have been associated with myelitis in adult NMOSD populations.[4][5][6] These are characterized by painful, stereotyped and recurrent spasms of one or more limbs and/or trunk.We present a case of PTS in pediatric NMOSD, highlighting the importance of recognizing this rare condition in children.A 14-year-old female, with no health problems aside from short stature was admitted to a pediatric tertiary care center with a threeday history of intractable non-bloody, non-bilious emesis and excessive hiccups.She also reported numbness to her upper neck and bilateral shoulders and arms in a cape-like distribution.She

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques→Same topicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies→French-language works237,207→