Construction and Inference Method of Semantic-Driven, Spatio-Temporal Derivation Relationship Network for Place Names
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As the proper noun for geographical entities, place names provide an intuitive way to identify and access specific geographic locations, playing a key role in semantic expression and spatial retrieval. However, existing research has insufficiently explored the spatio-temporal derivation relationships of place names, failing to fully utilize these relationships to enhance the connectivity between place names and improve spatial retrieval capabilities. Therefore, this paper conducts research on the spatio-temporal derivation relationships of place names, defines them in a standardized manner, clarifies the boundary conditions and identification methods, and then constructs a spatio-temporal derivation network of place names for expression and uses this network to carry out reasoning research on spatial adjacency relationships. Experiments and results showed that using the theory and methods of this paper to identify the spatio-temporal derivation relationships of Canadian place names achieves an accuracy rate of 98.5% and a recall rate of 93.4%, and the reasoning results can effectively improve the accuracy of query results. The research enriches the theoretical framework of spatio-temporal derivation relationships of place names, solves the current problems of unclear definition and inability to automatically identify spatio-temporal derivation relationships, and provides new perspectives and tools for the application practice in the field of geographical information science.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".