MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402529935 · doi:10.1101/2024.09.12.612594

Assessing the performance of TRX and DUF148 antigens for detection of prepatent Guinea worm ( <i>Dracunculus medinensis</i> ) infection in dogs

2024· preprint· en· W4402529935 on OpenAlexaff
Hassan Hakimi, Pabasara Weerarathne, Meriam N. Saleh, Raquel R. Rech, Richard Ngandolo, Philip Ouakou Tchindebet, Sidouin K. Metinou, Lucienne Tritten, Guilherme G. Verocai

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversitySte. Anne's Hospital
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Institutes of HealthCarter Center
KeywordsBiologyVirologyMicrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Guinea worm (GW, Dracunculus medinensis ) is a nematode that causes a painful and debilitating neglected tropical disease in humans. The GW Eradication Program has decreased human infections by >99% over the last 40 years. However, GW emergence in animal hosts, particularly dogs, has hampered eradication efforts. Currently, there is no method for diagnosing GW infection in animals during the prepatent period, before the adult female worms emerge. Previous works have identified two GW proteins, TRX and DUF148, as immunoreactive antigens with GW-positive human and dog sera. This study developed and validated indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) using each antigen alone or in a combination of both antigens. Using serum samples from experimentally exposed dogs, TRX and DUF148 showed reactivity at 9- and 11-weeks post-exposure, respectively. In an experimentally infected ferret, TRX and DUF148 showed reactivity at 13- and 15-weeks post-exposure, respectively. These antigens were further validated using sera of dogs from endemic villages in Chad (n=47) and shelter dogs from the non-endemic United States (n=492). DUF148 showed better reactivity and sensitivity of 76.6.% in detecting GW infection in prepatent sera compared to TRX. However, DUF148 cross-reacted with one serum sample from Brugia pahangi experimental infection and several shelter dog sera. The anti-DUF148 titer was significantly higher in the shelter dogs positive for gastrointestinal nematodes than in negative dogs. To mitigate this cross-reaction, we produced 3 peptides of DUF148. Peptide 3 from the C-terminal was more reactive with prepatent sera and had a sensitivity of 83%; however, the specificity was not superior to DUF148 whole antigen. The antibody response to DUF148 in Chad dogs with the history of GW emergence waned overtime but was detectable until two years post-GW-emergence. Our findings could facilitate the development of diagnostic methods for early detection of GW infection in dogs in endemic countries. Authors summary Dracunculiasis or Guinea worm (GW) disease is a neglected tropical disease caused by the nematode Dracunculus medinensis and is targeted for eradication by the World Health Organization. The main challenge for the eradication program is the emergence of animal infections, especially dogs. Diagnostic tests are needed to find infected dogs during the prepatent period to better control infection and prevent the spread of GW. Previous studies have found two immunoreactive GW proteins, TRX and DUF148. In this study, we validated these antigens to detect infection in before GW emergence. Using sera of dogs from endemic areas of Chad, we found that DUF148 was more reactive and had promising sensitivity to detect the prepatent infection in an indirect ELISA assay. However, DUF148 also showed cross-reaction with some sera of dogs from the Unites States, a non-endemic area for GW. To mitigate this cross-reactivity, we performed ELISA using shorter peptides. We found peptide 3 that covers the C-terminal of the protein is the immunogenic part of DUF148. However, peptide 3 ELISA did not outperform whole antigen ELISA. This study confirms the applicability of DUF148 ELISA in detecting prepatent infections in dogs and could assist the GW Eradication Program.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicParasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207