MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402530896 · doi:10.61132/jutrabidi.v1i4.247

Pengaruh Kepemilikan Akta Kelahiran Dan Akta Perkawinan Terhadap Capaian Kepemilikan Dokumen Administrasi Kependudukan Kabupaten Sikka Tahun 2023

2024· article· en· W4402530896 on OpenAlexaff
Iselia Lopes

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Transformasi Bisnis Digital · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Studies and Policies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBirth certificateDecreeBusinessPopulationCertificateGeographyPolitical scienceMedicineLawEnvironmental healthComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Population administration in Indonesia involves managing various aspects such as birth, marriage, death and identity. These records ensure legal identity and facilitate access to public services. In Sikka district, there is a significant shortage of birth certificates and marriage certificates with 52.83% of the population not having birth certificates by 2023 and 46.40% of married couples not having marriage certificates. This Policy Paper aims to achieve birth certificate and marriage certificate registration coverage in Sikka District by 2024 and develop policy recommendations to improve coverage. A quantitative approach is used to analyze the percentage of birth certificate and marriage certificate processing in 2023. In-depth interviews with civil registration officers and residents to identify challenges and perceptions related to the registration process were also conducted. The results of the analysis show that there is a significant gap in the ownership of birth certificates and marriage certificates in various sub-districts in Sikka district with contributing factors including many people not realizing the importance and benefits of having these documents, remote areas facing difficulties accessing civil registration services, the cost of going to the civil registry office is high and traditional/customary practices over legal documentation. To address this, the policy recommendations are the Sikka Regent Decree on the ASANTT application follow-up work plan and establishing mobile registration units and increasing the number of registration offices in remote areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Transformasi Bisnis DigitalSame topicLegal Studies and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207