MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402531857 · doi:10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.110203

Fluorescence-guided laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using indocyanine green angiography to prevent iatrogenic vascular injury: A case report and video

2024· article· en· W4402531857 on OpenAlexaff
Hernán Todeschini, Fernando Dip, Martín Drago, Kevin P. White, Raúl J. Rosenthal, Luis Sarotto

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Surgery Case Reports · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHernia repair and management
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIndocyanine greenInguinal herniaAngiographySurgeryIatrogenic injuryRadiologyIndocyanine green angiographyHerniaGeneral surgeryFluorescein angiography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) is one of the most common surgical procedures performed worldwide, associated with a roughly 10 % rate of complications, most commonly iatrogenic injury to blood vessels, sometimes necessitating conversion to open surgery. Fluorescence-guided laparoscopic surgery using indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG-FA) facilitates the precise identification of numerous anatomical structures, especially vascular, reducing their risk of iatrogenic injury. We present the first published case and video demonstrating LIHR with ICG-FA to prevent intra-operative vascular injury. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 46-year-old, otherwise-healthy male with a right inguinal hernia underwent fluorescence-guided LIHR using ICG-FA. Before peritoneal dissection, 2 ml ICG was administered intravenously, followed by 10 ml physiological solution. The surgical field was then illuminated using the Stryker fluorescence system. Once vascular structures were located, the sac was dissected. After reversing the peritoneum, but before placing the extraperitoneal mesh, another dose of ICG was administered intravenously to aid in safely securing the mesh. Both times after ICG injection, both the iliac artery and spermatic arteries were clearly visible throughout their course in the surgical field within 45 s. The hernia was repaired successfully with no complications. DISCUSSION: ICG-FA appears to facilitate inguinal hernia repair by enabling real-time visualization of anatomical structures, theoretically reducing the risk of complications, particularly vascular injuries. It is particularly helpful identifying the inguinal area's highly-vascular 'triangle of doom'. CONCLUSIONS: Further studies are warranted to evaluate short- and the long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness of ICG-fluorescence angiography during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0080.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Surgery Case ReportsSame topicHernia repair and managementFrench-language works237,207