MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402533443 · doi:10.1093/jas/skae234.791

PSII-30 Exploring the prebiotic potential of enzymatically released bioactive components from canola fiber on growth performance and gut health of broiler chickens and weaned piglets

2024· article· en· W4402533443 on OpenAlexaff
Yanxing Niu, B.A. Slominski, C. M. Nyachoti, Rob Patterson, Anna Rogiewicz

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCanolaBroilerPrebioticFood scienceBiologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In our research, canola meal (CM) was incubated with a specific multi-carbohydrase cocktail and protease to enhance the bioactivity of its fiber components. This process resulted in the enzymatically modified canola meal solubles (ECMS) product, which was obtained following spray-drying of water-soluble fraction of the incubated CM. The ECMS was hypothesized to exhibit prebiotic effects in monogastric animals due to its composition, which includes components resulting from the hydrolysis of non-starch polysaccharides (NSP), such as low-molecular-weight polysaccharides and oligosaccharides. Compared with CM, ECMS contained more crude protein, ash, and phosphorus, and less intact NSP, neutral detergent fiber (NDF), phytate phosphorus, sucrose, and raffinose and stachyose. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of ECMS supplementation on the growth performance, nutrient digestibility, gut function and health of broiler chickens and weaned piglets. Ross 308 broiler chickens were assigned to three dietary treatments with 6 birds per cage and 8 replicates per treatment. The birds were raised under a controlled environment for 14 d. The experimental diets consisted of a corn/soybean meal Control diet, a Low ECMS diet containing 1g/kg of ECMS, and a High ECMS diet containing 20 g/kg of ECMS. The results indicated that the High ECMS diet led to a significant increase in feed intake (FI) and body weight (BW) gain compared with both the Low ECMS and the Control diets. No significant differences were observed in feed conversion ratio, pH of ileal and cecal digesta, sialic acids secretion, or apparent total tract digestibility of NDF and nitrogen between birds fed the different diets. Lactobacillus spp. and Enterococcus spp. were significantly more abundant in both the ileal and cecal digesta of birds fed the High ECMS diet compared with the Control diet. Total short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) in the ileal digesta of birds fed ECMS diets significantly increased compared with birds fed the Control diet. Weaned piglets (TN 70 × TN Tempo) were randomly assigned to two dietary treatments with 8 replicate pens in a randomized complete block design. Pigs were fed a corn/soybean meal Control diet containing 50 g/kg of CM and an experimental diet containing ECMS, replacing 20 g/kg of CM, for 3 wk (1 to 21 d post-weaning). The results showed that experimental diets had no significant impact on growth performance. However, the ECMS diet decreased the pH value of the colon contents and increased the population of Bifidobacterium in the cecum and colon (P < 0.05). In conclusion, ECMS significantly modulated gut microbiota, increased SCFA production in the ileum, and improved the growth performance of broilers. In weaned piglets, ECMS demonstrated the ability to decrease intestinal pH and stimulate the proliferation of beneficial gut microbiota. Therefore, ECMS could be considered a promising prebiotic in monogastric animal nutrition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicProtein Hydrolysis and Bioactive PeptidesFrench-language works237,207