Intraocular malignant nerve sheath tumour in a brown eyed labrador retriever
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A 6‐year‐old, male, neutered, brown eyed labrador retriever was presented with an intraocular pale pink mass in the left eye. Enucleation of the globe was performed, and the mass was submitted for histopathology. Histology and immunohistochemistry confirmed the mass as a malignant nerve sheath tumour. There was no evidence of mass recurrence, and general and neurological examination remained normal at 9‐month follow‐up. While the majority of intraocular neoplasms are benign, a malignant neoplasm must be considered in all cases of intraocular mass. Differentiation between benign and malignant intraocular neoplasms is challenging and often requires enucleation with histopathology to confirm diagnosis. Tumour staging should be considered in the event of a malignant nerve sheath tumour. Finally, uveal malignant nerve sheath tumour should not only be considered in blue eyed dogs, but also in brown eyed dogs as in the present case.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".