Sleep problems in preschool mediate the association between chronotype and socioemotional problems at school-age
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Evening-chronotype is associated with increased socioemotional problems among school-aged children. Inadequate sleep and increased sleep problems are also prevalent among evening-chronotype children and may underlie the relationship between chronotype and socioemotional problems. However, it is unclear whether the association between chronotype and socioemotional problems at school-age may be mediated by poorer sleep during late preschool. METHODS: Our study utilized cross-sectional data to examine the relations between chronotype, sleep duration, sleep problems and socioemotional problems in preschoolers. We subsequently performed longitudinal mediation analyses to examine how the association between chronotype at preschool-age and later socioemotional problems at school-age may be mediated by sleep problems and sleep duration during late preschool. 399 children from the Growing Up in Singapore Towards healthy Outcomes (GUSTO) birth cohort study were included for analyses. Children's chronotype were identified with the Children's Chronotype Questionnaire at 4.5 years old. Sleep duration and problems were measured with the Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire at 4.5 and 6 years old. Socioemotional problems were evaluated using the Child Behavioral Checklist at 4 and 7 years of age. All questionnaires were caregiver-reported. RESULTS: Linear regressions demonstrated that eveningness was associated with concurrent sleep problems and internalizing, externalizing and total behavioral problems at 4-4.5 years old, but not sleep duration. Mediation analyses supported that sleep problems (and not sleep duration) at 6 years old mediated the relationship between chronotype and socioemotional problems at 7 years old. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest addressing sleep problems during early development may reduce socioemotional problems at school-age, especially among evening-chronotype children.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".