MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4402540913 · doi:10.1093/jas/skae234.327

230 The relationship between hormone status and the metabolism of androstenone and skatole in isolated porcine hepatocytes

2024· article· en· W4402540913 on OpenAlexaff
Christine Bone, E. James Squires

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAndrostenoneSkatoleMetabolismInternal medicineEndocrinologyHormoneChemistryBiologyBiochemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Surgical castration is a significant welfare concern within the swine industry; however, it is currently the most effective method to prevent boar taint, which is a meat quality issue that develops in entire male pigs due to the accumulation of androstenone and skatole in the fat. Metabolism of the boar taint compounds occurs within the liver and promotes their excretion, ultimately reducing the extent of their accumulation in the fat. Previous research has demonstrated that plasma concentrations of estrone sulfate (E1S), which are indicative of steroid hormone status in the boar, are highly variable between individual animals of similar live body weights at slaughter. Testicular steroids are known to influence the activity and expression of some enzymes regulating the metabolism of skatole, but the effect of hormone concentrations on the entire expression profile of enzymes responsible for boar taint metabolism has not been characterized. Therefore, the objective of this study was to relate plasma E1S concentrations at slaughter to expression levels of genes regulating the metabolism of androstenone and skatole and their respective metabolite profiles in isolated hepatocytes, to further characterize the relationship between hormone status and boar taint metabolism. Blood and liver samples were collected from 5-mo-old crossbred [(Yorkshire x Landrace) x Duroc] boars (n = 8)] at slaughter. Plasma E1S concentrations were quantified using a radioimmunoassay and gene expression in the liver was evaluated by RT-qPCR. Hepatocytes were also isolated and incubated with androstenone or skatole, with metabolite concentrations in the incubation media quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson correlation. Plasma E1S concentrations at slaughter ranged from 2.2-108.5 ng/mL and were positively correlated with overall skatole metabolism (r = 0.77, P = 0.0265), the production of the Phase I skatole metabolites 3-methyloxindole (3MOI; r = 0.80, P = 0.0183), and 3-hydroxy-3-methyloxindole (HMOI; r = 0.73, P = 0.0413), as well as expression levels of CYP2C33 (r = 0.88, P = 0.0042), CYP2C49 (r = 0.78, P = 0.0221), and CYB5R1 (r = 0.80, P = 0.0165), which regulate skatole metabolism. A strong positive relationship was also identified between overall skatole metabolism and the production of 3MOI (r = 0.96, P = 0.0001) and HMOI (r = 0.93, P = 0.001). Androstenone metabolism primarily resulted in the production of Phase II glucuronide metabolites, but the levels produced were not related to E1S concentrations or gene expression levels. Taken together, these results demonstrate that plasma E1S concentrations are related to the rate of skatole, but not androstenone, metabolism in mature boars. Additional research is required to assess the potential of E1S concentrations as a biomarker for the rate of skatole metabolism in vivo and establish thresholds that could be used to identify boars with high and low rates of metabolism. This may provide an opportunity to develop targeted treatments for boar taint based on the metabolic status of the animal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal Science→Same topicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism→French-language works237,207→