MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4402540923 · doi:10.1093/jas/skae234.159

322 Nutrient transport across gastrointestinal tissues using Ussing chambers

2024· article· en· W4402540923 on OpenAlexaff
A.H. Laarman, G.B. Penner

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicClinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUssing chamberNutrientBiologyBiochemistryEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract One of the principal roles of the gut is the absorption of nutrients to meet animal needs. While in vivo measures such as total tract digestibility indicate the totality of the nutrients that disappear, these methods provide no information on the digestion, site, flux, and mechanism of nutrient absorption. Nutrient absorption is a complex set of transport pathways including passive diffusion, facilitated transport, ion exchange, active transport, and secondary active transport that is driven by electrochemical gradients. To tease apart the complexities of nutrient transport at different sites along the gastrointestinal tract, Ussing chambers have been a useful tool. Two ex vivo chambers, filled with oxygenated physiological buffer, and separated by epithelial tissue allow for the detection of nutrient flux, transepithelial currents, and/or membrane permeability. Historically, detection of the nutrient of interest was achieved using radio-labelled or fluorescent tracers. Beyond detecting flux (uptake, efflux, net flux), Ussing chambers can also tease apart the complex network of transport pathways that govern nutrient absorption. Isolating specific transport pathways can be broad spectrum inhibitors, and alterations to the physiological buffers to target transport pathways of interest. Altering the electrical gradient using a voltage clamp for instance, can be used to neutralize, inhibit, or promote, the electrical gradient; such alterations can be especially useful for charged nutrients. Inhibitors, meanwhile, inhibit the activity of entire families of proteins, useful for when the role of specific protein transporters is of interest. Alterations to buffer composition, such as bicarbonate-free buffer solutions or the inclusion and exclusion of compounds with similar size and charge, can isolate transport solely dependent on that solute or provide knowledge on the solutes that may share a common transport mechanism. Together, these modulations allow for a powerful tool to study the presence or absence of nutrient transport and has been crucial in establishing absorption kinetics of ionic nutrients (e.g., Na+, Cl-), small organic nutrients (e.g., short chain fatty acids, glucose), and macromolecules (e.g., immunoglobulins). Done in conjunction with other techniques, Ussing chambers can offer strong insight to improve our understanding of nutrient absorption and epithelial physiology of the gut. This presentation will discuss the methods key to successful use of Ussing chambers, alongside with their limitations and ways to augment data generated by Ussing chambers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal Science→Same topicClinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology→French-language works237,207→