MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4402541114 · doi:10.1093/jas/skae234.141

308 Isoenergetic reduction of dietary macronutrients reveals distinct fecal metabolomic signatures in lean and obese cats fed at maintenance

2024· article· en· W4402541114 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kehan Zhang, Hannah Godfrey, Darcia Kostiuk, Janelle Kelly, Jennifer Saunders-Blades, Shauna L. Blois, Allison J. Collier, Adronie Verbrugghe

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet and metabolism studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFecesNutrientCATSFood scienceBiologyAnimal scienceMetabolomicsChemistryInternal medicineMedicineEcologyBioinformatics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Obesity has become a concerning problem in cats. Increasing evidence demonstrates the utility of metabolomics in identifying disease biomarkers and assessing the effects of nutritional interventions, although limited information exists regarding alterations in fecal metabolites in lean and obese domestic cats in response to different macronutrient content. In the current study, three extruded diets were formulated based on adult maintenance using an isoenergentic approach. These diets were created by adjusting the levels of identical ingredients to achieve a low-protein [LP; protein 28% metabolizable energy (ME), fat 40%ME, NFE 32% ME), a low-fat (LF; protein 42% ME, fat 30% ME, NFE 30% ME), and a low-carbohydrate (LC; protein 36% ME, fat 41% ME, NFE 23% ME] diet. Healthy neutered male adult cats [n = 18; body condition scores (BCS) 4 or 5 (lean, n = 9) and 8 or 9 (obese, n = 9)] were fed each diet for a period of 4 wk in a 3 x 3 Latin square design. Fecal samples from each cat were collected between d 22 and 28 of each treatment period. A total of 67 fecal metabolites in six groups (35 amino acids, 11 fatty acids, 10 sugars and sugar metabolites, 5 alcohols, 3 nitrogenous bases, and 3 others) were analyzed using 1H NMR spectroscopy. To evaluate the impact of body condition, diet and their interaction on each metabolite, proc GLIMMIX covariance structure was selected by the smallest Akaike information criterion value in SAS. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to check normality and lognormal or beta distribution were applied when appropriate. Bonferroni correction post-hoc test was followed to correct Type I error. Statistical significance was considered at P < 0.05. In lean cats, significantly greater concentrations of fecal proteinogenic and branched-chain amino acids, such as methionine, valine, and L-lysine, as well as pyruvic acid and sugars (P < 0.05) were observed. This suggests that these metabolites may either be more actively fermented by bacteria or not utilized as extensively as in obese cats, potentially contributing to a reduction in obesity status. Regardless of body condition, there is a possibility of an enhanced activity in the tryptophan degradation pathway, leading to the greatest concentrations of fecal tryptophan (P = 0.04) in the LF diet, while the greatest fecal D-galactose (P = 0.04) in the LP diet was likely due to the greater dietary carbohydrate content. These observed results suggested that fecal metabolites were influenced by both body condition and diet; however, body condition had a more substantial impact on metabolite changes in cats, whereas no body condition and diet interaction were noted. Overall, the study indicated distinct fecal metabolic signatures in lean and obese cats subjected to different macronutrient diets and further research is warranted to validate the observed findings. Funding was provided by Champion Petfoods, Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada and Mitacs Accelerate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal Science→Same topicDiet and metabolism studies→French-language works237,207→