MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4402541307 · doi:10.1093/jas/skae234.239

429 Maternal rate of gain and one-carbon metabolites supplementation alters the gene expression profile of fetal brain during early gestation in beef heifers

2024· article· en· W4402541307 on OpenAlexaff
Muhammad Anas, Alison K Ward, Wellison Jarles Silva Da Diniz, Layla E King, Jessica G Syring, Yssi L Entzie, Mara R Hirchert, Pawel P. Borowicz, Matt S Crouse, Lawrence P. Reynolds, Carl R Dahlen, J. S. Caton

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersAgricultural Research ServiceAuburn UniversityNorth Dakota State UniversityU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsGestationFetusBiologyEndocrinologyGene expressionBeef cattleAnimal scienceGeneAndrologyInternal medicinePregnancyBiochemistryMedicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Maternal nutritional plane during pregnancy may leave lifelong impacts on offspring in beef cattle. Given that, we hypothesized that the supplementation of one-carbon metabolites (OCM) during pregnancy would mitigate the negative effects of maternal rate of gain through brain gene expression regulation in early developing bovine fetuses. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of OCM supplementation and maternal rate of gain on gene expression in the developing fetal brain in gestating beef heifers. Herein, Angus crossbred heifers (n = 72, body weight = 406 ± 33 kg) were randomly assigned to 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments with two levels of maternal rate of gain (CON, 0.60 kg/d; and RES, -0.23 kg/d) each with or without OCM supplementation (+OCM, and -OCM). Heifers were fed individually and were bred using female-sexed semen from a single sire. The OCM supplementation included rumen-protected choline (44.4 g/d) and methionine (7.4 g/d) in corn carrier fed daily and weekly injections of folate (320 mg) and vitamin B12 (20 mg). The -OCM heifers received the corn carrier and saline injections. The treatments started at the time of breeding and continued until d 63 of gestation when pregnant heifers (n = 29) were slaughtered to collect fetal brain tissues for RNA sequencing. The fetal brain phenotypic data were analyzed using MIXED procedures of SAS, indicating that restricted nutrition affected the fetal right hemisphere weight (P < 0.05), and there was a strong tendency for overall fetal brain weight (0.05 < P < 0.1) to be affected as well. Brain transcriptomics data were analyzed using STAR aligner and a total of 177 differentially expressed genes (DEGs, FDR < 0.05) were identified across all treatment comparisons using DESeq2. Most of the DEGs were either isoforms of spliceosomal non-coding RNAs or micro-RNAs (miRNAs) associated with biological processes (FDR < 0.1) like mRNA processing, cellular nitrogen metabolism, lipid metabolism, and post-transcriptional gene silencing. The key miRNAs upregulated in the brain tissue of restricted fetuses without OCM supplementation, bta-mir-2375, bta-mir-876, and bta-mir-196a-1, were found to be associated with early embryogenesis and essential cellular regulatory processes. Conversely, in restricted fetuses with OCM supplementation, upregulated miRNAs such as bta-mir-216b, bta-mir-2285dd, and bta-mir-1298 were linked to early embryonic development, muscular development, and lipid metabolism in cattle. Both phenotypic and transcriptomics data here revealed that the maternal rate of gain altered fetal brain development, with differences seemingly compensated by OCM supplementation. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal Science→Same topicCancer-related molecular mechanisms research→French-language works237,207→