5 Hands-on 3: Introduction to developing Python computational pipelines for predictive machine learning modelling of livestock data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This hands-on workshop aims to offer examples of computational pipelines that apply traditional predictive machine learning modelling techniques to animal science datasets with the purpose of solving classification and/or regression problems. The objective of this workshop is to provide the attendants with fully functional and customizable computational pipelines developed in Python. The workshop is structured in a hands-on format and includes a combination of basic notions about machine learning and relevant algorithms, evaluation measures, evaluation strategies and Python code examples. To avoid technical problems related to installing a Python environment on personal computers, we recommend the registrants to acquire access on the Repl.it platform (https://replit.com/) by creating a free account prior to attending the workshop. Detailed information will be provided before the beginning of the workshop at the following URL: http://animalbiosciences.uoguelph.ca/~dtulpan/conferences/asas2024/
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.222 | 0.110 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".