MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402541592 · doi:10.1093/jas/skae234.176

513 Genomic landscape of adaptation in dairy cattle under selection in different environmental conditions

2024· article· en· W4402541592 on OpenAlexaffabout
Larissa Graciano Braga, Danísio Prado Munari, Tatiane C C S Chud, Júlia L Rodrigues, Bacem Saada, Marco Antônio Machado, J. C. do C. Panetto, Marcos G B V G B Silva, Flávio S. Schenkel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdaptation (eye)Selection (genetic algorithm)Dairy cattleGenomic selectionBiologyBiotechnologyAnimal scienceGeneticsComputer scienceGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Unique genetic patterns in the genome of individuals who have experienced a selection process are called selection signatures. These signatures can identify genomic regions with phenotypic effects. In the case of dairy cattle, the Holstein breed was intensively selected to maximize productivity in temperate environments. In contrast, zebu cattle are better adapted to tropical and subtropical environments but with decreased productivity. The dairy Gir cattle is the most important dairy zebu in Brazil for its adaptation to the tropical environment. This study aimed to identify selection signatures between Holstein and Dairy Gir. Samples of 42 sires from the National Dairy Gir Breeding Program in Brazil underwent whole-genome sequencing (WGS), were aligned to the ARS_UCD1.2 bovine reference genome and processed according to the 1000 Bull genome project (1KBull) pipeline. WGS data from 307 Holstein animals from Canada and the United States from the 1KBull (Run 9) were used. Phasing was performed using Beagle, and selection signatures between populations were investigated using the extended haplotype homozygosity (XP-EHH) test with windows of 50 Kb containing ≥ 5 SNPs in the “rehh” R package. The top and bottom 0.5% extreme windows were considered potential selection signatures. Subsequently, a functional enrichment analysis (P-value < 0.05) of genes overlapping the selection signatures was performed. For the Holstein population, 153 selection signatures were detected, harboring 160 genes. Terms related to ovarian steroidogenesis, cardiovascular system, lipid absorption, sulfur, fatty acid, and lipid metabolism were enriched. Disruptions in sulfur metabolism were previously observed in cows with clinical mastitis in Holstein. Fatty acid and lipid metabolism are related to negative energy balance, which increases lipid mobilization, leading to loss of body condition and greater concentrations of non-esterified fatty acids in circulation. This may further affect fertility due to the excess accumulation of lipids in the oocytes and endometrium, mainly because the postpartum uterus is remodelling. The intensive selection for milk production in Holstein is negatively associated with reproduction. The potential link between disruptions in lipid metabolism with inflammation and reproductive health may ultimately lead to an increase in days open. For the Dairy Gir population, 198 selection signatures flanking 220 genes were detected. Unlike the Holstein population, the genes under selection pressure in the Gir population were predominantly enriched to cell differentiation and organization, amine and amino acid metabolism, and protein metabolism, digestion, and absorption. Exposure to heat stress may cause ruminal epithelium damage, affecting DNA replication and amino acid metabolism. Amino and fatty acids are important for directing energy production to promote damaged tissue repair. Thus, these regions are candidates for playing an important role in heat tolerance. In conclusion, different genetic regions under selection pressure between populations were identified, indicating breed-specific adaptations and mechanisms underlying milk production, metabolic disorders, and reproduction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockFrench-language works237,207