MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402541708 · doi:10.1093/jas/skae234.460

212 Accuracy of genomic prediction for indicator traits of resistance to gastrointestinal nematode parasites in grazing Arcott Rideau sheep

2024· article· en· W4402541708 on OpenAlexaffabout
Samla M F Cunha, Flávio S. Schenkel, Ivan Carvalho Filho, Ángela Cánovas

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicHelminth infection and control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrazingBiologyNematodeResistance (ecology)Ecology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Gastrointestinal nematodes (GINs) parasites are a major problem in the sheep industry. To mitigate their impact, combined approaches need to be applied, which may include the implementation of genomic evaluation for indicator traits of resistance to GIN to increase genetic gain. This study aimed to investigate the impact of including genomic information in the genetic evaluation of indicator traits of resistance to GIN in grazing Arcott-Rideau sheep in Ontario. Fecal egg count (FEC) was counted using Triple Chamber (FEC-TC; n = 1,626) and McMaster (FEC-MM; n = 790) methods from samples collected from ewes and rams between 15 to 20 mo of age from 2012 to 2023. Trait values were transformed using a natural log. Two-trait analysis was performed using a repeatability model and the blupf90+ family programs to estimate variance components and predict breeding values. The models included month and year of evaluation, as fixed effects, and animal, permanent environment, and contemporary group, defined as animals of the same sex evaluated in the same year and month of evaluation, as random effects. The analysis was performed twice; 1) using a traditional model, in which pedigree information was used to calculate the relationship matrix (A), and 2) using a genomic model fitting a hybrid genomic relationship matrix (H). Quality control was performed, which included excluding SNPs with MAF < 0.05 and Call rate < 0.90 and samples with Call rate< 0.90; animals with parent-progeny conflicts were also removed. A total of 50,486 SNPs and 950 genotyped animals were included in the analysis to create the H matrix. The prediction accuracies were calculated as √1-SEPi2/(1+fi)σa2, where SEPi is the standard error of prediction of the estimated breeding value (EBV) of the ith animal; fi is the inbreeding coefficient of the ith animal; and σa2 is the population additive genetic variance. Four groups of animals were considered: i) where all animals were used; n = 14,626; ii) rams with progeny; n = 125; iii) ewes with progeny; n = 1,741; and iv) genotyped animals without phenotype information; n = 501. The average accuracy for all scenarios was greater when the genomic information was considered in the model for both traits (i = 0.77; ii = 0.82; iii = 0.79; and iv = 0.77 versus i = 0.45; ii = 0.56; iii = 0.49; and iv = 0.44 with the traditional model). The moderate Spearman rank correlation for the top 5% of animals (731) between the EBVs from the traditional and genomic models for both FEC traits (0.68) indicated a considerable re-ranking of the animals, which can be expected since the genomic information accounts for the Mendelian sampling. These results indicate that the inclusion of genomic information in the genetic evaluation of FEC-MM and FEC-TC improves the accuracy of prediction and would help in a more accurate selection of animals for breeding, resulting in an increased genetic gain for GIN resistance in sheep.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score0.309

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicHelminth infection and controlFrench-language works237,207