346 Investigating the potential of incorporating indirect genetic effects into genetic evaluations of dairy calf disease traits
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The goal of infectious disease control is often local eradication, but this is theoretically impossible to achieve based on classical quantitative genetic theory. Current methods focus on the susceptibility of individuals to disease and assume that exposure to a pathogen is 1) constant over time, 2) equal among individuals, and (3) due entirely to the environment. For this reason, it is likely that conventional genetic methods are capturing only a fraction of genetic variation in disease occurrence. The incorporation of epidemiological theory into quantitative genetics provides an opportunity to better determine the level of genetic variation in infectious disease traits. This stems from the ability to include the positive feed-back dynamics of infectious disease transmission. From an epidemiolocal perspective, both susceptibility and infectivity also have indirect genetic effects (IGE), because the genotype of one individual impacts the risk of infection of other individuals, and this can drastically affect the rate and direction of response to selection. Epidemiological models unravel the genetic heterogeneity in both susceptibility and infectivity traits, and account for the impact each animal has on its contemporaries compared with conventional quantitative genetic approaches. From a calf health perspective, there is a shift towards group housing dairy calves, primarily due to welfare and social acceptability. In turn, this will lead to increased animal interactions from a young age. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the potential of incorporating IGE into current quantitative approaches to determine its impact on selection potential. Our study looked at two common infectious diseases in calves on dairy farms: respiratory problems (RESP) and diarrhea (DIAR). Producer-recorded data comprised of 19,445 records collected on 34 herds that group housed calves between 2007 and 2020. Calves were allocated into pen groups based on birth dates and herd specific housing practices. Original phenotypes were split into 10 records, each representing a week of life, to determine when exactly calves became sick and infective. Several scenarios were investigated with respect to the time an animal was infective for following a disease case (1 or 2 wk), and the maximum difference in weeks between animal birth dates to be included within the same pen (2 to 5 wk). Variance components were estimated using a generalized linear mixed model fitting a complementary-log-log link function with offset for exposure. Initial heritability estimates for susceptibility on the observed scale for DIAR ranged from 0.03 to 0.07, and from 0.02 to 0.03 for RESP across scenarios. While heritability estimates for infectivity are currently being investigated, the results for susceptibility highlight the potential for incorporating IGE into genetic evaluation of disease traits and provide an introduction towards incorporating epidemiological theory into classical quantitative approaches to better respect the transmission dynamics of infections.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".