MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4402541953 · doi:10.1093/jas/skae234.712

PSLBI-17 Total sulfur amino acid requirements across the canine life cycle in Labrador Retrievers using the indicator amino acid oxidation (IAAO) technique

2024· article· en· W4402541953 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sarah M Dickerson, C. Timlin, Fiona B Mccracken, Jason W Fowler, C.N. Coon

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle metabolism and nutrition
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSulfurAmino acidBiochemistryChemistrySulfur cycleBiologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Methionine and cysteine are the principal sulfur-containing amino acids that are incorporated into proteins, although homocysteine and taurine also have important physiological roles in canines. As limited studies have been conducted for total sulfur-containing amino acids (TSAA) requirements across the canine life cycle, our objective was to determine the minimum requirements (MR) for TSAA at 4 life stages using the indicator amino acid oxidation (IAAO) technique. Labrador Retrievers (n = 24) were used in feeding studies to evaluate the changing requirements of TSAA as dogs mature: 6 puppies aged 10 to 14 wk, 6 puppies >14 wk to 9 mos, 6 adults 2 to 5 yr (yr), and 6 seniors > 8yr. Following a 2-d adaptation to a TSAA-adequate basal diet (TSAA = 1.12% dry matter), dogs underwent individual IAAO studies. In brief, all dogs were randomly fed one of six test diets with varying levels of TSAA ranging from deficient to sufficient (final TSAA content in experimental diets were 0.41, 0.46, 0.51, 0.98, 1.05, and 1.12% dry matter, with indispensable amino acids formulated at 1.6x NRC values). The test diet was divided into 13 equal meals; at the 5th meal, a tracer amino acid was included (a bolus L-[1-13C] phenylalanine based on body weight was first given, followed by [1-13C] Phe doses every 30 spanning 4 h). Breath samples were collected via a respiration mask every 30 min. Total CO2 production was determined via indirect calorimetry and production of 13CO2 at each dose was measured by enrichment of 13C in breath samples via isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS). Results for IRMS data were converted to atom percent excess (APE) and analyzed using segmented linear regression. The Four Rivers mean and population requirements for TSAA were estimated to be 1.55 ± 0.069 g/1,000 kcal (mean ± 2 SD) for puppies 10 to 14 wk, 1.53 ± 0.21 g/1,000 kcal (mean ± 2 SD) for puppies 14 wk to 9 mo, 1.4 ± 0.30 g/1000 kcal (mean ± 2 SD) for adults 2 to 5 yr, and 1.27 ± 0.23 g/1,000 kcal (mean ± 2 SD) for seniors. These results may contribute to the formulation of diets that meet the age-appropriate requirements of TSAA for large-breed dogs at all life stages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal Science→Same topicMuscle metabolism and nutrition→French-language works237,207→