Advancing model-based systems engineering in biomedical and aerospace research:
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) represents a modern methodology for developing complex systems using models, prioritizing alignment with customer preferences through comprehensive systems based modeling. Using PRISMA guidelines, data was gathered from peer-reviewed journals, systematic reviews, case studies, and computational studies from databases such as PubMed and Google Scholar, from the past 24 years. The study provides a comprehensive view of the current state of MBSE applications in healthcare and engineering addressing the practical challenges they face, offering strategic suggestions to improve future outcomes. This research introduces the Dynamic Risk Management Framework (DRMF), designed to leverage real-time data and predictive analytics to bolster system reliability and performance. The reviewed articles illuminate the essential role of MBSE in creating sophisticated systems and emphasize the need for improved modeling language integration, standardized processes, and increased interoperability. Further studies are required to validate its effectiveness and overcome its current limitations. As an emergent discipline within systems engineering, MBSE holds significant promise for future development, positioning itself as a critical tool for optimizing diverse fields of application. Further investigations are essential to validate MBSE's effectiveness and address its existing limitations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it