The steady-state response of a three-phase elliptical inhomogeneity with interface slip and diffusion under an edge dislocation in the matrix
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We study the steady-state response of a three-phase elliptical inhomogeneity in which the internal elliptical elastic inhomogeneity is bonded to the surrounding infinite matrix through an interphase layer with two confocal elliptical interfaces permitting simultaneous interface slip and diffusion. The matrix is subjected to an edge dislocation at an arbitrary position and uniform remote in-plane stresses. An analytical solution to the steady-state problem is derived using Muskhelishvili’s complex variable formulation. The effect of the edge dislocation and remote loading on the elastic fields in the inhomogeneity and the interphase layer is exhibited through a single loading parameter. More specifically, when divided by this loading parameter, the expressions for the stresses and strains in the inhomogeneity and the interphase layer are uninfluenced by the specific loading applied in the matrix. After excluding a particular common factor, the stresses and strains in the inhomogeneity and the interphase layer are also unaffected by the mismatch in shear moduli between the interphase layer and the matrix.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".