MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402544446 · doi:10.1016/j.rinp.2024.107962

A comparative study of optical property on unintentionally doped and Sn-Doped β-Ga2O3 crystals by EFG method with a cylindrical Ir die

2024· article· en· W4402544446 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueResults in Physics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGa2O3 and related materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Shandong ProvinceState Key Laboratory of RoboticsNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaState Key Laboratory of Crystal Materials
KeywordsDopingDie (integrated circuit)Materials scienceProperty (philosophy)OpticsOptoelectronicsCrystallographyPhysicsChemistryNanotechnologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• A comparative study of optical property on unintentionally doped and Sn-doped β -Ga 2 O 3 crystals. • The strong anisotropy in Raman peak and intensity of β -Ga 2 O 3 between three different planes and in-plane. • The strong anisotropy in optical transmittance, bandgap values, surface barrier height, luminescence centers and level of electron ionization. In this work, we carried out a comparative study of optical property on unintentionally doped and Sn-doped β -Ga 2 O 3 crystals by edge-defined film-fed growth (EFG) method with a cylindrical iridium (Ir) die. The non-polarized Raman spectra showed the anisotropy in Raman peak position and intensity for three different planes (i.e., (100), (010) and (001)) of β -Ga 2 O 3 crystals, independent of the Sn dopant. A difference in the Raman spectra between the unintentionally doped and Sn-doped β -Ga 2 O 3 crystals was observed in the (001) plane. The strong in-plane anisotropy of the monoclinic β -Ga 2 O 3 crystal related to the crystallographic orientation was demonstrated by the angle-resolved polarized Raman spectroscopy. The Sn dopant cannot change the optical transmittance and bandgap values of the unintentionally doped and Sn-doped β -Ga 2 O 3 crystals with the (100), (010) and (001) orientations. However, the Sn-doped β -Ga 2 O 3 crystal with the (010) orientation showed the higher valence band maximum and lower surface barrier height values. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of the unintentionally doped and Sn-doped β -Ga 2 O 3 crystals with the (010) orientation was also measured, which showed no obvious difference. The different luminescence centers and level of electron ionization of the unintentionally doped and Sn-doped β -Ga 2 O 3 crystals were observed by the cathodoluminescence spectroscopy and electron paramagnetic resonance, respectively. Based on the comprehensive comparison, it can be concluded that the anisotropy in optical property of the unintentionally doped and Sn-doped β -Ga 2 O 3 crystals with (100), (010) and (001) orientations apparently exist.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.484

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it