MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract A058: Primary cancer-associated fibroblasts alter tumor organoid chemosensitivity through epigenetic regulation

2024· article· en· W4402551376 on OpenAlexaffabout
Emilie Jaune, Zachary Klassen, Joana Ribeiro Pinto, Maria Nica, Nadeem Hussain, Michael Sey, Ken Leslie, Matthew J. Cecchini, Crystal Engelage, Danielle Porplycia, Stephen Welch, Brian Yan, Christopher L. Pin

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Cells and Metastasis
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrganoidEpigeneticsCancerCancer researchBiologyMedicineInternal medicineCell biologyGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the 3rd leading cause of cancer-related deaths in Canada with a 5-year survival rate at ∼12%. A major cause of this poor survival rate is the inefficiency of current treatments. Only 20% of patients are eligible for surgical resection while the other 80% are treated with chemotherapies (nab-paclitaxel, Gemcitabine, FOLFIRINOX) having limited efficacy. This resistance is due to the PDAC tumour microenvironment (TME), including cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). Numerous studies show CAFs and the TME affect tumour growth, chemoresistance and metastasis, but the mechanisms underlying the effects are unknown. Epigenetic mechanisms, including DNA methylation and histone modifications, link environmental factors to altered gene expression. Genes encoding epigenetic mediators are often mutated or over-expressed in PDAC, but a role in resistance has yet to be defined. We hypothesize that epigenetic reprogramming occurs in pancreatic cancer cells in response to secreted factors from CAFs leading to increased therapy resistance. Methods: Most work to date on PDAC resistance has been performed with immortalized cell lines and in two dimensions. Therefore, to test our hypothesis, we established patient-derived organoids (PDO) and CAFs obtained from endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Clinical data was obtained through the DERIVE (Determination of Response to Therapy in Individual Patients) database. To examine the effects of CAFs on PDOs, we obtained conditioned media (CM) from four, early passage CAFs, grown 48 hours in culture. Organoid media was supplemented 1:1 with CAF-CM and six PDOs grown in this media for up to 14 days. PDO growth and the response to gemcitabine, FOLFIRINOX or radiation was monitored using an Incucyte system. To identify changes in the epigenome and how this reflects changes in gene expression, DNA methylation arrays and ATAC-Seq was performed before and after treatment with CAF-CM and aligned to RNA-seq analysis on RNA isolated at the same time point. Results: Exposure of PDOs to CAF-CM resulted in altered phenotypes and molecular profiles of PDOs in a patient-specific fashion. Increased resistance to chemotherapy (Gemcitabine) and radiotherapy was observed in multiple PDOs. Changes in DNA methylation and chromatin accessibility was aligned with transcriptomic data and identified known and novel pathways linked to chemoresistance. Metabolomic and cytokine analysis on CAFs-CM identified differential enrichment of metabolites linked to epigenetic mediators. We are currently determining if these factors secreted by the CAFs promote chemo and radio-resistance. Conclusions: This study shows the importance in integrating TME components when examining novel therapeutic options. In addition, we show (1) CAFs secrete factors that enhance therapeutic resistance in PDOs and (2) these changes likely involve altered epigenetic reprogramming. Future experiments will identify the epigenetic factors that can be targeted to counteract chemoresistance. Citation Format: Emilie Jaune-Pons, Zachary Klassen, Joana Ribeiro Pinto, Maria Nica, Nadeem Hussain, Michael Sey, Ken Leslie, Matthew Cecchini, Crystal Engelage, Danielle Porplycia, Stephen Welch, Brian Yan, Christopher Pin. Primary cancer-associated fibroblasts alter tumor organoid chemosensitivity through epigenetic regulation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Pancreatic Cancer Research; 2024 Sep 15-18; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(17 Suppl_2):Abstract nr A058.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicCancer Cells and Metastasis→French-language works237,207→