MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402555766 · doi:10.1002/pol.20240593

Exploring the reactivity and interactions of a poly(fluorene‐<i>co</i>‐tetrazine)‐conjugated polymer with <scp>Single‐walled Carbon Nanotubes</scp>

2024· article· en· W4402555766 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Polymer Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCarbon Nanotubes in Composites
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityBrockhouse Institute for Materials Research
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFluoreneTetrazineConjugated systemCarbon nanotubeReactivity (psychology)Materials sciencePolymerChemical engineeringPolymer chemistryNanotechnologyChemistryOrganic chemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Conjugated tetrazine‐containing polymers that undergo inverse electron demand Diels‐Alder (IEDDA) reactions with trans ‐cyclooctenes are interesting not only for their intrinsic optoelectronic properties, but also their interactions with π‐conjugated surfaces. Here, we prepared a series of poly(fluorene‐ co ‐tetrazine) polymers and carried out IEDDA reactions to decorate them with hydroxyl, hexadecyl, or triethylene glycol side chains. The polymers were investigated pre‐ and post‐IEDDA coupling in terms of their ability to disperse single‐walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) in organic solvent. It was found that polymer molecular weight, side chain structure, and degree of conjugation all impacted the quality of SWNT dispersions. While the starting poly(fluorene‐ co ‐tetrazine) polymer produced concentrated dispersions, the post‐IEDDA polymer containing dihydropyridazine groups did not produce dispersions of equal concentration. However, upon oxidation to the fully aromatic pyridazines, the polymers regained their ability to form concentrated dispersions. Furthermore, the post‐IEDDA polymers exhibited increased selectivity toward metallic SWNTs relative to the starting polymer. Due to the efficiency of the IEDDA reaction, it was also possible to use this chemistry to derivatize the nanotube complex with poly(fluorene‐ co ‐tetrazine) post‐dispersion. Overall, this work demonstrates the first use of reactive polytetrazines to disperse SWNTs, allowing rapid modification of polymer‐nanotube complexes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.689

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it