High Voltage and High Frequency DC Power Supply with Ultra High Voltage SiC Schottky Barrier Diode Modules
Bibliographic record
Abstract
直流高電圧電源は高周波交流をインバータで生成し，後段のトランスやCockcroft-Walton (CW) 回路で昇圧を行う方式が一般的である。インバータの高周波化により，CW回路のコンデンサ容量の低減ができ，電源の小型化が期待できる。CW回路に用いる高耐圧ダイオードは素子を直列接続した超高耐圧のSiCモジュールの開発により，300 kHz以上の高周波動作が可能となり，素子の直列数による耐圧設計が可能となった。一方で，直列数と導通損失は比例するため，高耐圧化の限界もある。本稿では出力電圧を得るためのダイオード素子の直列数をCW回路の段数設計と合わせて検討することで，電源の性能向上に有効な構成を明らかにした。
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".