Preclinical lentiviral hematopoietic stem cell gene therapy corrects Pompe disease-related muscle and neurological manifestations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pompe disease, a rare genetic neuromuscular disorder, is caused by a deficiency of acid alpha-glucosidase (GAA), leading to an accumulation of glycogen in lysosomes, and resulting in the progressive development of muscle weakness. The current standard treatment, enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), is not curative and has limitations such as poor penetration into skeletal muscle and both the central and peripheral nervous systems, a risk of immune responses against the recombinant enzyme, and the requirement for high doses and frequent infusions. To overcome these limitations, lentiviral vector-mediated hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) gene therapy has been proposed as a next-generation approach for treating Pompe disease. This study demonstrates the potential of lentiviral HSPC gene therapy to reverse the pathological effects of Pompe disease in a preclinical mouse model. It includes a comprehensive safety assessment via integration site analysis, along with single-cell RNA sequencing analysis of central nervous tissue samples to gain insights into the underlying mechanisms of phenotype correction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".