Unsupervised clustering of mining-induced microseismicity provides insights into source mechanisms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Microseismic source mechanisms in underground mines can provide information about the rock mass response to mining. Conventional approaches to such studies rely upon moment tensor solutions that are susceptible to modeling assumptions and need reliable information about source locations and high-resolution velocity models. We propose the application of unsupervised clustering to group microseismic events into different classes directly from the waveform data such that the events in a specific class have similar source mechanisms. Our method has three main steps, first using spectral decomposition to separate the source terms from the path-receiver contributions in the observed amplitude spectra of events occurring in spatially dense clusters. Second, reducing the number of features from the source spectra using independent component analysis (ICA). Third, applying a Gaussian mixture model (GMM) to the reduced feature matrix to obtain event clusters. To test our method, we generate synthetic waveform data using the receiver network and the recorded microseismic event locations in an underground potash mine in Saskatchewan. Results show the ability of our method to separate events into different classes corresponding to differences in source mechanisms. Application to field data recorded in the mine during February 2021 successfully discriminates between blasts and microseismic events. The data recorded between 1 March and 30 June 2021 that contain microseismic events only are divided into two dominant classes. Using known moment tensors (MT) of some of these events for labeling, we interpret one of the two classes as having dominant double-couple mechanisms as compared to the other which most likely corresponds to the linear dipole-tensile mechanisms. Our method, combined with some expert knowledge such as MT of some larger magnitude events, can offer an assessment of source types of large microseismic populations as often encountered in induced seismicity .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".