Improving agricultural sustainability – A review of strategies to valorize tomato plant residues (TPR)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
• Valorization is needed for post-harvest biomass from tomato agriculture (TPR) • TPR is rich in lignocellulosic materials and extractable compounds. • TPR requires use with other materials to be a competitive product alternative. • Full use of TPR can require coordination with other valorization methods. • Tomato plant residue valorization is an integrative endeavor. Considerations for the modification of agricultural practices and waste management to improve environmental sustainability remain a subject of great importance. Prioritization of intensive mass food production to meet the demand of an increasing human population has introduced a multitude of environmental issues due to, among other factors, the large volumes of waste output. Tomato production in greenhouses, for example, generates tonnes of bio-waste per hectare each harvest including green tomato plant residues ( i.e. , stems, leaves, branches). Giving value to these green tomato plant residues collected during the growing cycle and after harvest has not proven straightforward despite a massive yearly release of tonnes of carbon dioxide from stems and leaves disposed on landfills. This paper aims to summarize current research in tomato plant residue valorization and to identify considerations for future valorization strategies. Peer reviewed articles, scientific books and governmental, economic and statistical reports on the topic of tomato plant residues were collected and analyzed. Focuses included traditional valorization approaches, bio-refinement strategies and conversion of fiber-rich residues into high value packaging materials. Initiatives for sustainable agriculture, their market relevance, and the strengths and weaknesses of using tomato plant residues in these valorization approaches are discussed. Overall, it was concluded that valorization of tomato plant residues would be a highly integrative endeavor that would require coordination from multiple levels in the agricultural production chain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it