Global dynamic features and information of adjacent hidden layer enhancement based on autoencoder for industrial process soft sensor application
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract There is a lack of consideration of temporal and spatial correlation in the process variables and adjacent hidden layers correlation in the soft sensor model of stacked autoencoders. To address the issue, a novel global dynamic adjacent layer information enhancement auto encoder (GD‐ALIEAE) method is proposed to improve the poor prediction performance. The gated recurrent unit (GRU) and uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) are applied to the GD‐ALIEAE model for obtaining global dynamic features of the temporal and spatial information of process variables by parallel computation. An adjacent layer information correlation algorithm is proposed to avoid the loss of hidden layers information during the stacking process. The algorithm enhances the features of the low layer through nonlinear mapping, combining the low layer and its adjacent layer as input. The input then is fed to the multi‐head attention mechanism to obtain features that contain adjacent layer correlation. Finally, a prediction model is established through a fully connected layer. Through simulation experiments on two industrial cases of sulphur recovery unit and thermal power plant, and compared with models of stacked autoencoder (SAE), stacked isomorphic autoencoder (SIAE), and target‐related stacked autoencoder (TSAE), the effectiveness of the proposed method was verified.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".