The implementation and evaluation of a mock trial using a flipped classroom pedagogy in practical nursing education.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: This quality improvement study explores the implementation and evaluation of a mock trial within a flipped classroom pedagogy to help first-year practical nursing learners meet the class objectives. Methods: Sixty-two (N=62) practical nursing learners participated in a mock trial as part of their first year Nursing Arts course at Bow Valley College in July 2022. The mock trial was evaluated using qualitative and quantitative data collection. Results: The thematic analysis suggested that a mock trial using a flipped classroom pedagogy may be an effective way of teaching course objectives. The learners reported a moderate to high level of confidence in managing challenging situations after participating in the mock trial. Conclusions: The study highlights the potential benefits of incorporating a mock trial using a flipped classroom pedagogy in practical nursing education.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.030 | 0.044 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it