MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402568261 · doi:10.1109/twc.2024.3457608

RIS-Assisted Wireless Link Signatures for Specific Emitter Identification

2024· article· en· W4402568261 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ning Gao, Shuchen Meng, Cen Li, Shengguo Meng, Wankai Tang, Shi Jin, Michail Matthaiou

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Signal Modulation Classification
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesEuropean CommissionQueen's UniversitySoutheast UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaQueen's University BelfastNational Science Foundation
KeywordsComputer scienceWirelessIdentification (biology)Computer networkLink (geometry)TelecommunicationsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As one of the sensing tasks for integrated sensing and communications (ISAC), location distinction based specific emitter identification (SEI) plays an important role in location based services. In this paper, we propose a reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS)-assisted SEI system, in which the legitimate emitter installs an RIS to customize the wireless link signature by controlling the ON-OFF state of RIS. Specifically, we consider the worst-case that the legitimate and a suspicious emitter are in the same spatial location. The received signal strength (RSS) of the specific emitter is adopted to analyze the feasibility of the proposed system. Then, we derive the statistical properties of this wireless link signature, and find the interesting insights about the phase-shift matrix configuration and the signal-to-noise-rate (SNR) gain, which showcase the huge potential of the proposed system on the integrated communications and security (ICAS) design in the near future. Afterwards, we derive the optimal detection threshold in the context of the presented metrics. Next, considering the acquisition difficulty of the RSS samples of the suspicious emitter, we use a one-class support vector machine (OC-SVM) to identify the specific emitter. Finally, the actual feasibility of the proposed system is verified via proof-of-concept experiments. The experiment results show that there are 76% and 99% performance improvements for the test statistic based and the OC-SVM based RIS-assisted SEI, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Wireless CommunicationsSame topicWireless Signal Modulation ClassificationFrench-language works237,207