MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402570247 · doi:10.1109/tmc.2024.3461708

LI2: A New Learning-Based Approach to Timely Monitoring of Points-of-Interest With UAV

2024· article· en· W4402570247 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersSoutheast UniversityNatural Science Foundation of Jiangsu ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer sciencePoint of interestHuman–computer interactionReal-time computingArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) play a critical role in disaster response, swiftly gathering information from various points-of-interest (PoIs) across extensive areas. The freshness of this information is measured by the age of information (AoI), representing the time since the latest information acquisition of a specific PoI. However, devising AoI-minimizing routes for UAVs in obstructed post-disaster environments poses unique challenges that have yet to be fully overcome. Obstacles, like post-disaster barriers, can impede direct flight paths between PoIs, and limited battery life requires energy-conscious route planning. Additionally, existing solutions fail to universally minimize varying data freshness requirements. This research addresses the AoI-driven UAV travel problem, seeking to establish periodic routes that optimize AoI metrics while considering energy and general graph constraints. We develop a learning-based algorithm to enhance the current route iteratively, utilizing guidance from a deep reinforcement learning (DRL) agent and executing a series of operations to potentially decrease AoI while adhering to topological and energy constraints. The algorithm is validated on real post-disaster datasets, demonstrating significant improvements in various AoI metrics compared to other learning-based approaches. Furthermore, our algorithm outperforms approximation algorithms and can approach the global optimum when tailored to existing AoI-minimizing problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.774
Threshold uncertainty score0.747

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it