MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

WhisperLink: A Novel Anonymous Messaging Service for a Secured Data Communication

2024· article· en· W4402571618 on OpenAlexaff
Martin Morales, Amit Boyina, Dev Kothari, Md Moniruzzaman, Ajmery Sultana

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInternet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
Canadian institutionsAlgoma UniversityLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceService (business)Computer securityInternet privacyBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

WhisperLink is an innovative anonymous messaging service that aims to enhance privacy in digital communication. Hosted on the secure and robust infrastructure of the Google Cloud Platform, WhisperLink enables users to create secure, temporary chat rooms that self-destruct after 24 hours. By not requiring logins, WhisperLink ensures confidentiality, enabling users to communicate without worrying about the risks associated with the exposure of personal data. WhisperLink places a strong emphasis on confidentiality and anonymity by employing end-toend encryption, which ensures that messages can only be read by the intended recipients. It also has additional authentication features such as security questions, allowing only authorized users to access chat rooms. The platform deletes messages after $\mathbf{2 4}$ hours and does not store any residual data, therefore keeping conversations private and transient. The platform can be used innovatively in various user scenarios, making it ideal for social, professional, and private interactions. WhisperLink provides a flexible and secure platform for immediate, private communication, offering a user-friendly and efficient messaging experience. With these features, WhisperLink stands out as a leading solution in secure, anonymous digital communication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.650

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInternet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-votingFrench-language works237,207