Social Participation Restrictions and Explanatory Factors in Adults with Oculopharyngeal Muscular Dystrophy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background. Limited knowledge is available regarding the impact of oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy (OPMD) impairments on participation in daily and social activities, which currently hinders occupational therapy practice in this population. Purpose. To describe social participation and explore influencing factors in individuals with OPMD. Methods. Thirty-four individuals were assessed with outcome measures of social participation restrictions, mobility, dysphagia, and fatigue. Spearman correlations and stepwise multiple regression analyses were used. Findings. Results show a negative impact of OPMD on the social participation level, which was more important in participants aged over 60 years. Walking speed was found to be the main factor influencing participation levels for daily and social activities, with faster walking associated with higher participation. Conclusions. This study emphasizes the impact of OPMD impairments and limitations on social participation level. While dysphagia is obviously an important impairment to consider, interventions for mobility limitations should also be considered during clinical follow-up.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".