Spatial Distribution of Thaw Depth in Palsas Estimated From Optical Unoccupied Aerial Systems Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Maximum seasonal thaw depth, referred to as active layer thickness (ALT), is one of the key parameters used to monitor permafrost conditions. ALT maps based on interpolation of point measurements or derived from coarse or moderate spatial resolution satellite data often hide small‐scale spatial variations in thaw depth resulting from differences in surface characteristics and microtopography. To model and predict changes in hydrological and biogeochemical processes in permafrost areas accurately, high‐resolution remote sensing‐based estimations of ALT are needed. Therefore, we applied random forest (RF) regression on a set of topographical and spectral vegetation indices derived from optical unoccupied aerial systems data, Landsat 8 land surface temperature (LST) data, and field measurements to estimate thaw depths in palsas at three mires in north‐west Finland. We also analyzed differences in thaw depths between mires located at different elevations, between dome and plateau‐shaped palsas, and between different vegetation and surface cover classes. The RF models resulted in root mean square errors from 2.4 to 5.7 cm between predicted and observed thaw depths and the R 2 values of 0.57–0.96. Height from the surrounding fen surface and LST were the most important variables in thaw depth models, although high‐accuracy results were also achieved without LST. The mean thaw depths did not differ between the sites with lowest and highest elevation, whereas the thaw depths were significantly deeper in dome‐shaped palsas compared to plateaus. The thaw depths were significantly different between vegetation cover classes only on plateau‐shaped palsas. The results indicate the high impact of the topography on the palsa thaw depth, thus highlighting the importance of accurate elevation models in spatial modeling of palsa ALT. The methodology presented in this study can be applied to other permafrost regions where field measurements of ALT are accompanied with high‐resolution topographical and multispectral data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".