MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402574465 · doi:10.62517/jhve.202416319

Exploration and Research on the Construction of Vocational English Curriculum in China under the Context of Digital Transformation

2024· article· en· W4402574465 on OpenAlexaff
Han Luo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of higher vocational education. · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEducational Reforms and Innovations
Canadian institutionsEducation and Early Childhood Development
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVocational educationChinaCurriculumContext (archaeology)Transformation (genetics)Mathematics educationDigital transformationSociologyEngineeringPedagogyComputer scienceGeographyPsychologyWorld Wide WebArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study delves into how digital transformation affects vocational English education in China, revealing the positive impacts of digital tools and strategies on teaching methodologies, curriculum content, and educational quality. The research indicates that the application of online Learning Management Systems (LMS), Virtual Reality (VR), and interactive platforms has significantly enhanced interactivity and practicality in vocational English education. Innovative teaching methods such as flipped classrooms and project-based learning have been effectively employed, enhancing students’ critical thinking and practical skills. However, the study also highlights issues that still need attention and resolution, such as insufficient digital skills among teachers, unequal distribution of technological resources, and a disconnect between teaching practices and student needs. To address these challenges, it is recommended to strengthen policy support, enhance teachers’ digital teaching capabilities, improve curriculum content to better meet student needs, and promote school-enterprise cooperation to strengthen practical teaching.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.778
Threshold uncertainty score0.432

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of higher vocational education.Same topicEducational Reforms and InnovationsFrench-language works237,207