MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402575979 · doi:10.1099/ijsem.0.006528

Phylogenomic and molecular marker based studies to clarify the evolutionary relationships amongst Anoxybacillus species and demarcation of the family Anoxybacillaceae and some of its constituent genera

2024· article· en· W4402575979 on OpenAlexaff
Isha R. Patel, Sarah Bello, Radhey S. Gupta

Bibliographic record

VenueINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicIdentification and Quantification in Food
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyCladePhylogenetic treePhylogeneticsEvolutionary biologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The family Anoxybacillaceae was recently proposed encompassing the genera Anoxybacillus, Geobacillus, Parageobacillus, Saccharococcus and Thermolongibacillus. Of these genera, Anoxybacillus contains >50% of the Anoxybacillaceae species. However, Anoxybacillus species form multiple unrelated clades in phylogenetic trees and their evolutionary relationships are unclear. To clarify the evolutionary relationships of Anoxybacillus and other Anoxybacillaceae species, detailed phylogenomic and comparative analyses were conducted on 38 Anoxybacillaceae species with available genomes. In a phylogenomic tree based on 1148 core proteins, all Anoxybacillus, Geobacillus, Parageobacillus, Saccharococcus and Thermolongibacillus species, excepting Anoxybacillus sediminis, formed a strongly supported clade representing the family Anoxybacillaceae. Five conserved signature indels (CSIs) reported here are also uniquely found in these species, providing robust means for the demarcation of family Anoxybacillaceae in molecular terms. In our phylogenomic tree and in the Genomic Taxonomy Database, Anoxybacillus species formed four distinct clades designated as Anoxybacillus sensu stricto (containing the type species A. pushchinoensis), Anoxybacillus_A, Anoxybacillus_B and Anoxybacillus_C. Our analyses have identified 17 novel CSIs which offer means to reliably distinguish species from these clades based upon multiple uniquely shared molecular characteristics. Additionally, we have identified three and seven CSIs specific for the genera Geobacillus and Brevibacillus, respectively. All seven Brevibacillus-specific CSIs are also shared by Anoxybacillus sediminis, which branches reliably with this genus. Based on the strong phylogenetic and molecular evidence presented here, we are proposing that the genus Anoxybacillus should be restricted to only the species from Anoxybacillus sensu stricto clade, whereas the species from Anoxybacillus_A, Anoxybacillus_B, and Anoxybacillus_C clades should be transferred into three novel genera Anoxybacteroides gen. nov., Paranoxybacillus gen. nov. and Thermaerobacillus gen. nov., respectively. Additionally, we are also proposing the transfer of Anoxybacillus sediminis to the genus Brevibacillus. The proposed changes, which reliably depict the evolutionary relationships among Anoxybacillaceae species, should be helpful in the studies of these organisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGYSame topicIdentification and Quantification in FoodFrench-language works237,207