Alzheimer’s Multiclassification Using Explainable AI Techniques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, we address the early detection challenges of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) using explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques. AD, characterized by amyloid plaques and tau tangles, leads to cognitive decline and remains hard to diagnose due to genetic and environmental factors. Utilizing deep learning models, we analyzed brain MRI scans from the ADNI database, categorizing them into normal cognition (NC), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and AD. The ResNet-50 architecture was employed, enhanced by a channel-wise attention mechanism to improve feature extraction. To ensure model transparency, we integrated local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIMEs) and gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM), highlighting significant image regions contributing to predictions. Our model achieved 85% accuracy, effectively distinguishing between the classes. The LIME and Grad-CAM visualizations provided insights into the model’s decision-making process, particularly emphasizing changes near the hippocampus for MCI. These XAI methods enhance the interpretability of AI-driven AD diagnosis, fostering trust and aiding clinical decision-making. Our approach demonstrates the potential of combining deep learning with XAI for reliable and transparent medical applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".