MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402578824 · doi:10.55522/jmpas.v1i1.0004

Stability Indicating Validated Spectrometric Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Citalopram & Clonazepam in Marketed Formulation

2012· article· en· W4402578824 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Amita Patel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of medical pharmaceutical and allied sciences · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTreatment of Major Depression
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMedicure
KeywordsClonazepamCitalopramStability (learning theory)ChromatographyMathematicsChemistryComputer sciencePharmacologyMedicineMachine learningBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Simple, sensitive, specific and economic spectrophotometric method was developed and validated for simultaneous quantitation of Citalopram & Clonazepam in tablet dosage form. New method based on the simultaneous estimation of drugs in a binary mixture without previous separation was developed. In simultaneous equation method, Citalopram & Clonazepam were quantified using their absorptivity values of at selected wavelengths, viz., 239 nm and 308 nm respectively. The accuracy and reproducibility of the proposed method was statistically validated by recovery studies. The simultaneous equation method permits simple, rapid and direct determination of Citalopram & Clonazepam in commercially available tablet dosage form without previous separations and can therefore be used for routine analysis of both drugs in quality control laboratories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.113
GPT teacher head0.465
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of medical pharmaceutical and allied sciencesSame topicTreatment of Major DepressionFrench-language works237,207