MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402580163 · doi:10.1073/pnas.2403662121

Generating interstitial water within the persisting tetrahedral H-bond network explains density increase upon compressing liquid water

2024· article· en· W4402580163 on OpenAlexafffund
Mirko Förster, Nnanna Ukoji, Christoph J. Sahle, Johannes Niskanen, Robin Sakrowski, Göran Surmeier, Christopher Weis, Tetsuo Irifune, Sho Imoto, Hasan Yavaş, Simo Huotari, Dominik Marx, Christian Sternemann, John S. Tse

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMaterial Dynamics and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersDeutsches Elektronen-SynchrotronNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsTetrahedronLiquid waterBondCrystallographyMaterials scienceChemistryChemical physicsPhysicsThermodynamicsBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite its ubiquitous nature, the atomic structure of water in its liquid state is still controversially debated. We use a combination of X-ray Raman scattering spectroscopy in conjunction with ab initio and path integral molecular dynamics simulations to study the local atomic and electronic structure of water under high pressure conditions. Systematically increasing fingerprints of non-hydrogen-bonded H[Formula: see text]O molecules in the first hydration shell are identified in the experimental and computational oxygen K-edge excitation spectra. This provides evidence for a compaction mechanism in terms of a continuous collapse of the second hydration shell with increasing pressure via generation of interstitial water within locally tetrahedral hydrogen-bonding environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.646

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSame topicMaterial Dynamics and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207