MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4402580567 · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-72739-8

Characterization of human trabecular bone across multiple length scales using a correlative approach combining X-ray tomography with LaserFIB and plasma FIB-SEM

2024· article· en· W4402580567 on OpenAlexafffund
Tengteng Tang, Travis Casagrande, Pardis Mohammadpour, William J. Landis, Brent Lievers, Kathryn Grandfield

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Canadian institutionsLaurentian UniversityMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for InnovationMcMaster University
KeywordsMaterials scienceTrabecula (gastropod)CorrelativeFemtosecondBiomedical engineeringCharacterization (materials science)TomographyMicroscopyComputer scienceLaserNanotechnologyOpticsMedicinePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three-dimensional correlative multimodal and multiscale imaging is an emerging method for investigating the complex hierarchical structure of biological materials such as bone. This approach synthesizes images acquired across multiple length scales, for the same region of interest, to provide a comprehensive view of the material structure of a sample. Here, we develop a workflow for the structural analysis of human trabecular bone using a femtosecond laser to produce a precise grid to facilitate correlation between imaging modalities and identification of structures of interest, in this case, a single trabecula within a volume of trabecular bone. Through such image registration, high resolution X-ray microscopy imaging revealed fine architectural details, including the cement sheath and bone cell lacunae of the selected bone trabecula. The selected bone volume was exposed with a combination of manual polishing and site-specific femtosecond laser ablation and then examined with plasma focused ion beam-scanning electron microscopy. This reliable and versatile correlation approach has the potential to be applied to a variety of biological tissues and traditional engineered materials. The proposed workflow has the enhanced capability for generating highly resolved and broadly contextualized structural data for a better understanding of the architectural features of a material spanning its macroscopic to nanoscopic levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific Reports→Same topicAdvanced X-ray and CT Imaging→French-language works237,207→