MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402581099 · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012422

Facilitating pathway and network based analysis of RNA-Seq data with pathlinkR

2024· article· en· W4402581099 on OpenAlexafffund
Travis M. Blimkie, Yi Andy An, Robert E. W. Hancock

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS Computational Biology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA modifications and cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchKillam Trusts
KeywordsComputational biologyRNA-SeqRNANetwork analysisBiologyComputer scienceEvolutionary biologyBioinformaticsTranscriptomeGeneticsGene expressionGeneEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

R package pathlinkR is designed to aid transcriptomic analyses by streamlining and simplifying the process of analyzing and interpreting differentially expressed genes derived from human RNA-Seq data. It provides an integrated approach to performing pathway enrichment and network-based analyses, while also producing publication-quality figures to summarize these results, allowing users to more efficiently interpret their findings and extract biological meaning from large amounts of data. pathlinkR is available to install from the software repository Bioconductor at https://bioconductor.org/packages/pathlinkR/, with support available through the Bioconductor forums. The code, example, and supporting data is available on the GitHub repository at https://github.com/hancockinformatics/pathlinkR, under the GPL-3.0 license, where users may report problems or make suggestions using GitHub's issue system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.207

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0620.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS Computational BiologySame topicRNA modifications and cancerFrench-language works237,207