Reversible chemoresistance of pancreatic cancer grown as spheroids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
models are needed to identify active drugs to treat pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) patients. We used 3D hanging drop cultures to produce spheroids from five PAC cell lines and tested nine FDA-approved drugs in clinical use. All PAC cell lines in 2D culture were sensitive to three drugs (gemcitabine, docetaxel and nab-paclitaxel), however most PAC (4/5) 3D spheroids acquired profound chemoresistance even at 10 µM. In contrast, spheroids retained sensitivity to the investigational drug triptolide, which induced apoptosis. The acquired chemoresistance was also transiently retained when cells were placed back into 2D culture and six genes potentially associated with chemoresistance were identified by microarray and confirmed using quantitative RT-PCR. We demonstrate the additive effect of gemcitabine and erlotinib, from the 12 different combinations of nine drugs tested. This comprehensive study shows spheroids as a useful multicellular model of PAC for drug screening and elucidating the mechanism of chemoresistance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".