MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402586646 · doi:10.4095/p1vd4aw6sj

Major- and trace-element geochemistry of chromite from Alaskan-type ultramafic-mafic intrusions in British Columbia

2024· report· en· W4402586646 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dejan Milidragovic, Duane C. Petts, Michel Beauchamp, Matthew Polivchuk, Graham T. Nixon

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMineralogy and Gemology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChromiteUltramafic rockMaficGeochemistryGeologyTrace elementLayered intrusion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Magmatic sulfide mineralization in ultramafic-mafic intrusions at convergent margins is becoming an increasingly important global resource of critical metals (Ni-Cu-PGE). In the Canadian Cordillera, a sub-class of convergent margin ultramafic-mafic intrusions, known as Alaskan-type intrusions, occurs in the accreted arc terranes of the North American continental margin. These intrusions have long been recognized for their chromite-associated PGE mineralization. However, their potential to host significant Ni-Cu-PGE sulfide mineralization and to be used in efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through permanent carbon mineralization is becoming a focus of current research. This report describes the major and trace element compositions of dunite-hosted Cr-spinel (chromite), measured by Electron Probe Microanalysis (EPMA) and Laser Ablation-Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS). These data are part of the effort to better constrain the intrinsic petrological properties of magmas parental to Alaskan-type intrusions and evaluate their economic potential.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.114

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMineralogy and Gemology StudiesFrench-language works237,207