MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402587880 · doi:10.1080/03081087.2024.2404453

Bipartite unicyclic graphs with a unique perfect matching having the smallest positive eigenvalue equal to √2 − 1

2024· article· en· W4402587880 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLinear and Multilinear Algebra · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGraph theory and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersCouncil of Scientific and Industrial Research, India
KeywordsBipartite graphCombinatoricsMatching (statistics)MathematicsEigenvalues and eigenvectorsDiscrete mathematicsGraphStatisticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The smallest positive eigenvalue τ(G) of a simple graph G is the smallest positive eigenvalue of its adjacency matrix A(G). In [F. J. Zhang and A. Chang, Acyclic molecules with greatest HOMO-LUMO separation, Discrete Applied Mathematics, 98:165–171, (1999).], the authors characterized all nonsingular trees with τ equal to 2−1. We consider the same problem for bipartite unicyclic graphs with a unique perfect matching. Let U be the class of all connected bipartite unicyclic graphs with a unique perfect matching. In this article, we characterize all graphs U in U with the property that τ(U)=2−1. Further, we show that the largest limit point of the smallest positive eigenvalues of graphs in U is 2−1, whereas the smallest limit point is 0.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.551

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it