Minimum profile Hellinger distance estimation for single-index models
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Single-index models are the most commonly used covariate models and are widely used in statistical applications. Such models include linear models and generalised linear models as special cases. This article investigates efficient and robust estimates for single-index models. For this purpose, we employ the minimum distance approach which in general is automatically robust with respect to the stability of the quantity being estimated. In particular, the minimum Hellinger distance approach introduced by Beran [(1977), ‘Minimum Hellinger Distance Estimators for Parametric Models’, Annals of Statistics, 5, 445–463] produces estimators that are asymptotically efficient at the model density and simultaneously possess excellent robustness properties. In this paper, we construct a minimum profile Hellinger distance estimator (MPHDE) for single-index models. We prove the consistency of the proposed MPHDE and examine its finite-sample performance and robustness properties via Monte Carlo simulation studies and real data analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it