Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work touches upon one of the fundamental categories of Emotive Linguoecology – the category of emotivity. The article gives the definition of the term “emotivity”, emphasizes its difference with the term “emotionality” and describes its correlation with pragmatics of communication. It also provides a brief description both of its structure and the implementation of this category in the process of communication. The structure of the category of emotivity distinguishes several microfields, which differ from each other depending on a prevailing element, i.e. emotional, rational or intellectual, which, in its term, affects the ways of the category’s linguistic expression. The differences of microfields are illustrated by the examples of dialogical units from English-language artistic discourse, since they are viewed upon as the most similar to some communicative situations in real life. A collection of short stories by a contemporary Canadian writer, a winner of various prizes in the field of literature, Margaret Atwood “Stone Mattress” (i.e. the story «Revenant») was selected for the analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it