MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402592791 · doi:10.1080/1756073x.2024.2403200

Intersecting beliefs: witchcraft, curses, and Christian responses in Yoruba Pentecostalism

2024· article· en· W4402592791 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePractical Theology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican cultural and philosophical studies
Canadian institutionsRedeemer University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsYorubaPsychologyPhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article investigates the intricate relationship between witchcraft, curses, and Christian responses in Yoruba Pentecostalism, drawing on case studies, including TB Joshua’s Ministry, to illuminate the complex interplay between traditional beliefs and contemporary religious practices. It delves into how conventional beliefs in witchcraft and curses intersect with Christian doctrines and practices within Yoruba Pentecostal communities. The discussion covers the historical and cultural roots of witchcraft beliefs in Nigeria, the theological and sociological viewpoints within Pentecostalism, and contemporary Christian reactions to these ancient beliefs. This study illuminates the complexities of belief systems by analysing case studies and applying a symbolic interactionist framework.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.599
Threshold uncertainty score0.436

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it