MVSparse: Distributed Cooperative Multi-camera Multi-target Tracking on the Edge
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tracking people in multi-camera surveillance systems is challenging due to disparate perspectives, large volumes of data, and high computation demands. This paper presents a distributed cooperative pipeline for pedestrian tracking that exploits the spatial and temporal redundancy within and across the video feeds from multiple synchronized cameras. It consists of three key components: 1) a lightweight policy network trained online in a self-supervised manner on each camera, 2) a sparse backbone processing unit purpose-built for parallel processing of selected regions of all cameras, and 3 an online clustering algorithm for object association. Utilizing online distributed reinforcement learning, the fully end-to-end trainable pipeline can accelerate any tracking-by-detection method by reducing detection costs across multiple perspectives. MVSparse has been evaluated using two multi-camera multi-target pedestrian tracking datasets, WildTrack and MultiviewX. It reduces the amount of processed regions by up to 52% and 39% with only moderate degradation of 1% and 0.1% in tracking accuracy on the two datasets, respectively. On a real-world testbed comprising four NVIDIA Jetson TX2 and a GPU server, MVSparse accelerates the end-to-end process and reduces the communication overheads by 1.88 and $1.60 X$ with only 2.27% and 3.17% degradation in tracking accuracy on the two datasets, respectively
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".