Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a patient with Fontan circulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fontan circulation is created when a baby is born with only one functioning cardiac ventricle. A series of surgeries are performed to allow the ventricle to provide oxygenated blood to the systemic circulation and to create passive flow of venous blood to the pulmonary circulation via a conduit. Laparoscopic surgery poses several hemodynamic challenges to a patient with Fontan physiology attributable to carbon dioxide insufflation, positive pressure ventilation, and reverse Trendelenburg positioning. CLINICAL FEATURES: A 39-yr-old male with a Fontan physiology was referred to our tertiary care centre because of repeated bouts of cholecystitis requiring a percutaneous drain and now elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Because of repeated cardiac surgeries, the patient also had complete heart block and was pacemaker dependent. We placed an arterial catheter prior to induction of general anesthesia with tracheal intubation. Transesophageal echocardiography allowed for real-time intraoperative assessment of venous blood flow through the patient's extracardiac diversion system throughout the surgery. This information was used to guide management and determine circulation tolerance during the various stages of laparoscopy. Inhaled milrinone resulted in the shunt fraction returning to the patient's baseline. Intraperitoneal pressure was kept below 10 mm Hg, and systemic blood pressure was supported with a low-dose norepinephrine infusion. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography is a useful monitoring device during laparoscopic surgery when a patient has Fontan circulation. Knowing how to administer inhaled milrinone is a useful skill to decrease the shunt fraction through a patient's conduit, increasing pulmonary blood flow while avoiding hypotension.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".